Skip to main content

"Operation Eagle" Commission

King of Fools: "In the spirit of the 9/11 Commission, here is a brief look back at 'Operation Eagle', Germany's major air offensive against Great Britain.

The operation began in August of 1940 and although Germany was the overwhelming favorite, things didn't turn out quite as expected. Historian William L. Shirer points out a critical mistake by Hermann Goering in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich:

The skill of British Fighter Command in committing its planes to battle against vastly superior attacking forces was based on its shrewd use of radar. From the moment they took off from their bases in Western Europe the German aircraft were spotted on British radar screens, and their course so accurately plotted that Fighter Command knew exactly where and when they could best be attacked. This was something new in warfare and it puzzled the Germans, who were far behind the British in the development and use of this electronic device.
German fighter ace Adolf Galland later testified:
We realized that the R.A.F fighter squadrons must be controlled from the ground by some new procedure because we heard commands skillfully and accurately directing Spitfires and Hurricanes on to German formations...For us this radar and fighter control was a surprise and a very bitter one.

On August 12, the Luftwaffe staged a raid on enemy radar stations. Five stations in all were damaged, with one completely disabled. Yet, following a dismal showing in battles on August 15th, Goering called off all future attacks on the radar stations, declaring:
It is doubtful whether there is any point in continuing the attacks on radar stations, since not one of those attacked has so far been put out of action.

German pilots knew that radar granted an advantage to their opponent. German intelligence knew the location of many (if not all) of the radar stations. Shirer believes that this gross miscalculation is one of the major factors why Germany did not win the Battle of Britain. Why was this decision made? Could the available intelligence have allowed them to make a better decision?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Jodie Lane Project Responds to City Council Testimony

The Jodie Lane Project : New York, NY -- February 12, 2004. The City Council Transportation Committee held a hearing today to investigate the causes of Jodie S. Lane’s tragic electrocution death on January 16th. The testimony revealed a startling lack of oversight on the part of the Public Services Commission, charged with overseeing Con Edison’s compliance with the National Electric Safety Code, last revised in 1913. With only 5 inspectors at their disposal, the Public Services Commission relies entirely on Con Edison to report safety problems. Because Con Edison only reports incidents resulting in injury or death, the PSC was aware of only 15 shock incidents in the last 5 years. Con Edison has acknowledged that it actually received 539 reports of shock incidents in the same period, effectively admitting to misleading the PSC by an order of magnitude. It is not only this discrepancy that is alarming, but also the fact that the Public Services Commission, charged with ensuring

New York Post Online Edition

news : "December 29, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Startling new Army statistics show that strife-torn Baghdad - considered the most dangerous city in the world - now has a lower murder rate than New York. The newest numbers, released by the Army's 1st Infantry Division, reveal that over the past three months, murders and other crimes in Baghdad are decreasing dramatically and that in the month of October, there were fewer murders per capita there than the Big Apple, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. The Bush administration and outside experts are touting these new figures as a sign that, eight months after the fall of Saddam Hussein, major progress is starting to be made in the oft-criticized effort by the United States and coalition partners to restore order and rebuild Iraq. 'If these numbers are accurate, they show that the systems we put in place four months ago to develop a police force based on the principles of a free and democratic society are starting to